Activities

Three Complete Human-AI Partnership Activities

Overview

Each activity centers on a core principle: students discover what emerges when two fundamentally different kinds of intelligence collaborate. The activities invite students to experience firsthand how human insight and AI analysis complement each other in authentic cybersecurity contexts.

Every activity includes four grade-band versions spanning K-2 through 9-12, complete lesson plans with timing guides, student materials and worksheets, assessment rubrics, and implementation options for classrooms with limited technology access.

Research on human-AI collaboration shows that framing AI as a “tool” limits learning. When students see AI as a teammate with strengths (pattern recognition, speed) and limitations (context, judgment), they develop more sophisticated mental models. This prepares them for authentic cybersecurity work where human-AI partnerships are standard practice.

Explore the research →

Activity 1: Security Detective Teams

Students investigate security incidents alongside an AI partner, discovering through hands-on experience that AI excels at identifying patterns while humans excel at understanding context. Together, they solve mysteries that neither could unravel alone.

Core Learning: AI demonstrates strength in pattern recognition across large datasets, while humans bring irreplaceable capabilities in contextual understanding and judgment.

Grade Band Version Name Duration
K-2 Mystery Helpers 20-25 min
3-5 Locked Library Computers 30-35 min
6-8 Security Detective Teams 45-50 min
9-12 Threat Investigation 50-60 min

NICE Framework Connection: Defensive Cybersecurity, Vulnerability Analysis

Activity 2: Ethics in Automated Security

Students develop governance policies for AI security systems, confronting the reality that AI requires thoughtful human guidance and that these decisions carry genuine difficulty. The activity reveals that designing rules for intelligent systems involves navigating competing values rather than finding clear answers.

Core Learning: AI governance demands careful balancing of competing priorities. There are no easy answers in this domain, only thoughtful trade-offs.

Grade Band Version Name Duration
K-2 Robot Helper Rules 20-25 min
3-5 Computer Rules Committee 35-40 min
6-8 Ethics in Automated Security 45-55 min
9-12 AI Governance Workshop 50-60 min

NICE Framework Connection: Cybersecurity Policy and Planning, Privacy Compliance, Systems Security Management

Activity 3: AI-Assisted Incident Response

Students assume team roles during realistic security incidents, experiencing firsthand how cybersecurity professionals coordinate with AI systems when time pressure demands rapid, coordinated action.

Core Learning: Effective incident response emerges from diverse roles working in concert, each contributing specialized expertise that complements AI-driven analysis.

Grade Band Version Name Duration
K-2 Fix It Team! 20-25 min
3-5 Computer Problem Solvers 35-40 min
6-8 AI-Assisted Incident Response 50-60 min
9-12 SOC Analyst Simulation 55-60 min

NICE Framework Connection: Incident Response, Defensive Cybersecurity, Threat Analysis

Suggested Sequence

While each activity stands alone, running them in sequence builds progressively sophisticated understanding of human-AI collaboration:

%%{init: {'theme': 'base', 'themeVariables': { 'primaryColor': '#0C234B', 'primaryTextColor': '#fff', 'primaryBorderColor': '#0C234B', 'lineColor': '#AB0520', 'secondaryColor': '#E8E8E8', 'tertiaryColor': '#f5f5f5', 'fontFamily': 'system-ui, sans-serif'}}}%%
flowchart LR
    subgraph A1["Activity 1"]
        A1T["Security Detective Teams"]
        A1L["Introduces partnership concept"]
    end

    subgraph A2["Activity 2"]
        A2T["Ethics in Automated Security"]
        A2L["Explores governance implications"]
    end

    subgraph A3["Activity 3"]
        A3T["AI-Assisted Incident Response"]
        A3L["Applies partnership under pressure"]
    end

    A1 --> A2 --> A3

    style A1 fill:#0C234B,stroke:#0C234B,color:#fff
    style A2 fill:#0C234B,stroke:#0C234B,color:#fff
    style A3 fill:#0C234B,stroke:#0C234B,color:#fff

  1. Security Detective Teams introduces the partnership concept
  2. Ethics in Automated Security explores the governance implications that emerge from widespread AI deployment
  3. AI-Assisted Incident Response applies partnership dynamics to crisis situations

Implementation Tips

The activities work best when educators invest time preparing and reflecting on their facilitation approach.

Experiencing the activity yourself before teaching it helps you anticipate student questions and reactions. Modeling partnership language shows students how to engage with AI as a collaborator rather than an answer machine. When AI produces errors, treat these moments as valuable teaching opportunities that illuminate what AI cannot do. Finally, focus your debrief conversations on synthesis, since the deepest learning occurs when students articulate what each partner contributed to the investigation.

See the Implementation Guides for detailed support.

Extension Activities

For educators seeking to deepen learning after completing the core activities, two extension modules provide additional challenges:

Extension Focus Best After
AI Failure Friday Learning from AI mistakes and critical evaluation Any core activity
Executive Briefing Challenge Translating technical findings for non-technical audiences Activity 1 or 3

Explore Extension Activities →