Security Detective Teams
Quick-Start Guide for Educators
The Big Idea (Read This First)
This isn’t “students use AI to solve a mystery.” It’s students discovering what happens when two different kinds of intelligence work together.
The shift:
| Old Framing | This Activity |
|---|---|
| AI is a tool students use | AI is a partner with different strengths |
| Students get answers from AI | Students discover what each partner contributes |
| Human OR AI | Human AND AI together |
What students should discover (don’t tell them—let them find it):
- AI excels at: spotting patterns across data, remembering technical details, processing large volumes of information quickly
- Humans excel at: understanding context, reading social situations, making judgment calls about what matters
- Together: insights neither could reach alone
The Scenario (2 min)
Mysterious account lockouts at a middle school. Students investigate with an AI partner to figure out what’s happening.
Evidence includes: Login logs, password analysis, social media clues, network data.
The Flow (45 min total)
| Phase | Time | What’s Happening | Your Role |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Human First | 10 min | Students examine evidence WITHOUT AI | Circulate, prompt observation |
| 2. Partnership | 15 min | Students consult AI as teammate | Guide authentic dialogue (not search queries) |
| 3. Synthesis | 10 min | Teams document what each partner contributed | Push for specifics |
| 4. Debrief | 10 min | Whole-class discussion | Surface the distributed cognition insight |
Critical Facilitation Moves
During Phase 1 (Human First):
“What do YOU notice before asking anyone else?”
This matters because students need to experience their own pattern-recognition before comparing it to AI’s.
During Phase 2 (Partnership):
“Talk TO your AI partner, not AT it. Ask follow-ups. Disagree if you think it’s wrong.”
Watch for: Students treating AI like Google. Redirect: “Would you talk to a human teammate that way?”
During Phase 3 (Synthesis):
“Be specific: What did YOUR brain do that AI couldn’t? What did AI do that you couldn’t?”
This is where the partnership insight crystallizes.
Materials Needed
Low-resource option: Use the AI Response Cards instead of live AI. The learning works the same way.
The Debrief Questions That Matter
- “What did your human brain catch that AI missed?” (Context, social reading, judgment)
- “What did AI catch that you missed?” (Patterns, technical connections, speed)
- “What did you figure out TOGETHER that neither could alone?” (This is the goal)
If Things Go Wrong
| Problem | It’s Actually | Do This |
|---|---|---|
| AI gives wrong answer | A teaching moment about verification | “Interesting—how would you check that?” |
| Students over-rely on AI | They haven’t discovered AI’s limits yet | “What CAN’T AI tell you about this situation?” |
| Students dismiss AI | They haven’t discovered AI’s strengths yet | “What’s AI faster at noticing than you?” |
From “True Teamwork: Building Human-AI Partnerships” — NICE K12 2025
Dr. Ryan Straight, University of Arizona • ryanstraight@arizona.edu