Queries
Worked R examples for cross-framework and per-framework analysis
Each page below works through one question against the staged framework graph. R code, a table or figure, and a candid read of what the result does and does not support. Lift any of them as a starting point for your own analyses, or as a template when you have a new question.
More queries are in development. The template is the same throughout: the question, why it matters, the result, what the result does and doesn’t tell us, a reproduction recipe, and links to related queries.
| Query | What it answers | Tags |
|---|---|---|
| How does element density vary across frameworks? | Per-unit element density across the framework corpus, strict and with examples. The twelvefold-spread finding, reframed as a comparison of design philosophy rather than a quality ranking. | Cross-framework |
| How is element coverage distributed across US and EU frameworks? | Total element coverage across the framework corpus, split by jurisdiction. The roughly 14-to-1 US versus EU element-count ratio is the headline figure. What it does and does not say about the underlying frameworks is the point. | Cross-framework, Workforce, Cross-jurisdictional |
| Where do Cyber.org K-12 and CSTA standards lexically align? | Pairwise Jaccard similarity between 123 Cyber.org K-12 parent standards and 140 CSTA K-12 CS parent standards, with and without each side’s clarification-derived examples. The contrast between parent-only and full-document similarity is the methodological finding. | Cross-framework, K-12, Pedagogy |
| Where do NICE work roles align with CSEC2017 Knowledge Areas? | Pairwise Jaccard similarity between 41 NICE work roles and 8 CSEC2017 Knowledge Areas, with each unit’s full document (parent description plus all child elements concatenated) as the comparison surface. The uniformly-low similarity is the methodological finding. | Cross-framework, Workforce, Higher Ed |
| Where do NICE work roles align with ENISA ECSF role profiles? | Pairwise Jaccard similarity between 41 NICE work roles (US) and 12 ENISA ECSF role profiles (EU), with each unit’s full document (parent description plus all child elements concatenated) as the comparison surface. Median similarity is roughly three times the NICE-to-CSEC2017 finding because both NICE and ECSF are workforce-position vocabularies. | Cross-framework, Workforce, Cross-jurisdictional |
| Which NICE work roles concentrate the most element coverage? | Per-work-role element counts across NICE Framework v2. The top five carry roughly a fifth of total element coverage. The long tail is real, and what ‘covers NICE’ actually means depends on which end of the distribution a curriculum reaches. | Cross-framework, Workforce, NICE |
No matching items